In re: Clinton Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 2244(d)(1)(D) refers to “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• interpreting an analogous phrase under AEDPA as meaning “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• interpreting an analogous phrase under AEDPA as meaning “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• Section 2244(d)(1)(D)’s language “means the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• “[t]hough we do not decide that issue today, it appears that applying the statute of limitations to each claim [rather than to an entire petition] is consistent with AEDPA and the precedent of other circuits”
• Timeliness under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).