In re: Clinton Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 2244(d)(1)(D) refers to “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• interpreting an analogous phrase under AEDPA as meaning “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• interpreting an analogous phrase under AEDPA as meaning “the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• Section 2244(d)(1)(D)’s language “means the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim”
• “[t]hough we do not decide that issue today, it appears that applying the statute of limitations to each claim [rather than to an entire petition] is consistent with AEDPA and the precedent of other circuits”
• Timeliness under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clinton Young v. William Stephens, Director
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-07-29· cited 25×
• In Re: Erick Davila
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-04-23· cited 15×
• Solorio v. Muniz
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-05-08· cited 10×
• Joseph Osborne v. Pelicia Hall, Commissioner
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-08-12· cited 8×
• Clinton Young v. William Stephens, Director
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-07-30
• In Re: Erick Davila
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-04-25
• Guillermo Solorio, Jr. v. William Muniz
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-05-08
• Guillermo Solorio, Jr. v. William Muniz
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-07-20
• United States v. Washington
  District of Columbia· 2022-05-23

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vasquez v. Hillery
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
• Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
• James C. Flanagan v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 344×
• Donald Bennett v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 173×
• Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew Cate
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-21· cited 150×
• Case v. Hatch
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-04-12· cited 130×
• Prendergast v. Clements
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-11-06· cited 101×
• Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker
  Eleventh Circuit· 2013-01-09· cited 62×
• Kunkle v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-12-23· cited 55×
• Knox v. Johnson
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-08-22· cited 38×
• Ronald Dale Bachman v. Margaret Bagley, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-05-18· cited 37×
• Smith v. Quarterman
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-08-18· cited 27×
• Capozzi v. United States
  First Circuit· 2014-09-30· cited 19×
• Gerald DeCoteau v. Alex Schweitzer
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-12-23· cited 12×
• Pacheco v. Artuz
  S.D. New York· 2002-03-07· cited 10×
• Joe Perez Sierra v. Edward L. Evans, Warden
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-10-13· cited 3×