In Re Enron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that conflicts may disenfranchise certain creditors but refusing to appoint separate committees where there was no showing that the existing committee was providing inadequate representation
• “Ordering the appointment of additional committees, particularly given that the matter is often first reviewed and addressed by the U.S. Trustee, is an extraordinary remedy.”
• “The problem is that a committee may function just fine . . . and still not adequately represent a particular creditor group.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Dana Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-04-19· cited 7×
• In Re ShoreBank Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-03-12· cited 6×
• In re Residential Capital, LLC
  S.D. New York· 2012-10-23· cited 5×
• In Re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2005-07-06· cited 4×
• In Re Enron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-08-02· cited 2×
• In Re National R v. Holdings, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2008-02-29· cited 2×
• In re Budd Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-07-07· cited 1×