in Re Elijah Stewart, Relator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining complexity of properly characterizing “stock options,” and concluding that exercised stock options were part of payor’s “gross annual employment income” under alimony provision
• finding husband in violation but not in contempt of alimony order where order not clear and unequivocal, and husband had good faith belief of compliance
• upholding contractual obligation in alimony action but rejecting finding of contempt
• husband was properly ordered to make further payments from proceeds of stock options, but should not have been held in contempt
• husband not guilty of contempt where his failure to pay alimony obligation in full was result of good faith dispute over amount owed
• \the husband's disagreement [with how to interpret divorce judgment] or misunderstanding of the issue [did] not constitute clear and undoubted disobedience of a clear and unequivocal command\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).