Skip to main content

Ex Parte Williams

Citations

  • 690 S.W.2d 243
  • 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 376
  • 1985 Tex. LEXIS 788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contemnor who was sentenced to jail and released on bond was sufficiently restrained to justify issuance of writ of habeas corpus
  • concluding that Williams’s liberty was restrained even though he was out on bond because incarceration “is not a speculative possibility where the unfolding of events may render the controversy moot; his bond could be revoked at any time”
  • noting that contemnor’s liberty was restrained even though contemnor was out on bond because “his bond could be revoked at any time, resulting in his incarceration”
  • finding restraint on the petitioner’s liberty where petitioner’s “bond could be revoked at any time, resulting in his incarceration.”
  • while applicant for writ of habeas corpus need not actually be confined, some character of restraint is required
  • “‘It is not required that the applicant for a writ of habeas corpus be actually confined in a jail. Any character of restraint which precludes absolute and perfect freedom of action will justify the issuance of the writ.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.