Texas Supreme Court· 4/24/1985
Ex Parte Williams
Citations
- 690 S.W.2d 243
- 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 376
- 1985 Tex. LEXIS 788
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that contemnor who was sentenced to jail and released on bond was sufficiently restrained to justify issuance of writ of habeas corpus
- concluding that Williams’s liberty was restrained even though he was out on bond because incarceration “is not a speculative possibility where the unfolding of events may render the controversy moot; his bond could be revoked at any time”
- noting that contemnor’s liberty was restrained even though contemnor was out on bond because “his bond could be revoked at any time, resulting in his incarceration”
- finding restraint on the petitioner’s liberty where petitioner’s “bond could be revoked at any time, resulting in his incarceration.”
- while applicant for writ of habeas corpus need not actually be confined, some character of restraint is required
- “‘It is not required that the applicant for a writ of habeas corpus be actually confined in a jail. Any character of restraint which precludes absolute and perfect freedom of action will justify the issuance of the writ.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Metzger v. SebekTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-11-10· cited 438×
- Bradt v. WestTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-12-22· cited 213×
- Rosser v. SquierTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 107×
- Ex Parte BristerTexas Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 83×
- Hernandez v. HernandezTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-06-30· cited 55×
- Ex Parte CasillasTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-07-26· cited 42×
- Pandozy v. BeatyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-02· cited 37×
- In Re RaglandTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1998-07-20· cited 36×
- Ex Parte RosserTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-06-15· cited 29×
- Ex Parte BowersTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-11-17· cited 29×
- Collins v. KegansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-30· cited 28×
- Drew v. Unauthorized Practice of Law CommitteeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-07-02· cited 24×
- In Re PierreTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2001-02-15· cited 24×
- Ex Parte HugheyTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1996-10-23· cited 21×
- Vernon v. VernonTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2005-11-03· cited 18×
- Wead v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-11-14· cited 16×
- In Re NaylorTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-12-02· cited 11×
- in the Estate of Cecelia Margaret GibbonsTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-07· cited 11×
- In Re EastonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-08-10· cited 10×
- In Re RossTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-17· cited 9×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court· 1973-04-18· cited 742×
- Deramus v. ThorntonTexas Supreme Court· 1960-02-24· cited 122×
- Ex Parte TrilloCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-09-15· cited 54×
- Ex Parte GreenTexas Supreme Court· 1980-07-09· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.