Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/22/2019
In re E.L.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1490
Syllabus
Evid.R. 807 – Evid.R. 803(4) – Evid.R. 803(2) – hearsay – exception – medical treatment or diagnosis – primary purpose – child advocacy center – forensic interviewer – abuse of discretion
Judges: Teodosio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court· 1993-07-07· cited 1,996×
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 489×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. HuertasOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 195×
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 175×
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 163×
- State v. JustOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-10· cited 45×
- State v. StorchOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-19· cited 45×
- Carrothers v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 1970-09-23· cited 24×
- State v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-22· cited 15×
- State v. StoverOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 13×
- State v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30· cited 10×
- State v. PittsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-13· cited 7×
- State v. WaltersOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-30· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-15· cited 4×
- State v. MeyersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.