Skip to main content

In re E.L.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1490

Syllabus

Evid.R. 807 – Evid.R. 803(4) – Evid.R. 803(2) – hearsay – exception – medical treatment or diagnosis – primary purpose – child advocacy center – forensic interviewer – abuse of discretion

Judges: Teodosio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.