In re E.J.M.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3082
Syllabus
PARENTING TIME – BEST INTEREST – R.C. 3109.051 – CONTEMPT – R.C. 2705.031: Where the juvenile court considered the best interest factors to conclude that terminating Father's parenting time was in the best interest of the child, it did not err in terminating Father's parenting time. Where Mother had a reasonable, good faith belief that she had to deny Father's parenting time to protect the safety of the child, the juvenile court did not err by failing to hold her in contempt for denying Father's parenting time.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a child coming home from visitation with bruises, scratches, and exhibiting unusual distressed behavior was a sufficient basis to withhold parental- visitation time
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Hagan v. HaganOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-10· cited 10×
- Morrison v. WaltersOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-18· cited 9×
- Steele v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-23· cited 7×
- In re C.D.Y.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-17· cited 6×
- Thompson v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-06· cited 6×
- Veach v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 5×
- Massong v. TynerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.