California Supreme Court· 2/1/2010
In Re EJ
Citations
- 223 P.3d 31
- 47 Cal. 4th 1258
- 104 Cal. Rptr. 3d 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[S]ection 3 [of the California Penal Code] reflects the common understanding that legislative provisions are presumed to operate prospectively, and they should be so interpreted unless express language or clear and unavoidable implication negatives the presumption.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baxter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-12-10· cited 183×
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-03-29· cited 89×
- People v. MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 71×
- In re TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 65×
- People v. DejesusCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-07-26· cited 52×
- People v. ChilelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-04-14· cited 38×
- People v. VinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-03-28· cited 37×
- People v. McShaneCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-14· cited 25×
- People v. KorwinCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-05-31· cited 19×
- People v. BocklettCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-04-30· cited 17×
- In re DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-01-06· cited 16×
- People v. Douglas M.California Court of Appeal· 2013-10-24· cited 13×
- Semler v. General Electric Capital Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2011-06-29· cited 13×
- In re SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-06-30· cited 13×
- D.M. v. Department of JucticeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-10-12· cited 11×
- People v. MosleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-09-29· cited 10×
- In re EfstathiouCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-11-04· cited 10×
- Jensen v. HernandezE.D. California· 2012-03-30· cited 8×
- People v. Christman 9/10/4 CA1/4California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-10· cited 6×
- In re Quoc Thai PhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-05-16· cited 4×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-10-30· cited 814×
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-04-21· cited 420×
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 401×
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-04-24· cited 388×
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 357×
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-12-02· cited 297×
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-24· cited 250×
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-09-19· cited 220×
- Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2002-08-05· cited 180×
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 155×
- CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-24· cited 150×
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 139×
- In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-09-24· cited 123×
- People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-02· cited 121×
- Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 91×
- People v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.