California Supreme Court· 10/30/1975

People v. Lent

Citations

541 P.2d 545
15 Cal. 3d 481
124 Cal. Rptr. 905
1975 Cal. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A condition of probation will not be held invalid unless it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3
“When a statute ... lists several acts in the disjunctive, anyone of which constitutes an offense, the complaint, in alleging more than one of such acts, should do so in the conjunctive to avoid uncertainty.”
“When a statute . . . lists several acts in the disjunctive, any one of which constitutes an offense, the complaint, in alleging more than one of such acts, should do so in the conjunctive to avoid uncertainty.”
discussing analysis of probation conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

354 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Lent

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.