In Re Durham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Section 109(g)(2) on Chapter 13 debtor eligibility ‘“does not explicitly prescribe for [sic] sua sponte dismissal or conversion,’ [but Section] 105(a) ‘accommodates such a result.’ ”
• embracing the “causal 19 connection approach” but dismissing the case with a 180-day bar to re-filing because the debtors obtained dismissal of their first bankruptcy case six days after relief from stay was filed and then 20 the debtors re-filed two months later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.
  S.D. New York· 2017-12-04· cited 41×
• In re Guerrero
  S.D. Texas· 2015-09-09· cited 9×
• In re Payton
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-11-05· cited 6×
• Rivera v. Matos
  First Circuit· 2013-06-26· cited 5×
• Bruce A. Ruth & Dawn Conversions, Inc. v. Swigert (In re Swigert)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-04-01· cited 5×
• In re Gill
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2018-01-22· cited 4×
• Dos Anjos v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Dos Anjos)
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-11-06· cited 2×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connecticut National Bank v. Germain
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
• Adams v. Zarnel
  Second Circuit· 2010-08-26· cited 147×
• In the Matter of Carol Ann Hammers, Debtor. Carol Ann Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-04-13· cited 59×
• In Re Luna
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-01-17· cited 40×
• Andersson v. Security Federal Savings & Loan (In Re Andersson)
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-06-13· cited 38×
• In Re Ross
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-02-08· cited 37×
• In Re Richardson
  M.D. Louisiana· 1998-02-04· cited 25×
• In Re Santana
  W.D. Michigan· 1990-02-16· cited 24×
• In Re Copman
  E.D. Missouri· 1993-12-17· cited 21×
• In Re Flores
  S.D. New York· 2003-03-21· cited 21×
• In Re Salazar
  S.D. Texas· 2006-03-29· cited 18×
• In Re Marrama
  D. Massachusetts· 2006-07-14· cited 14×
• In Re Fiorillo
  D. Massachusetts· 2011-06-24· cited 13×
• Grossman v. Beal (In Re Beal)
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-07-28· cited 12×
• Kuo v. Walton
  M.D. Florida· 1994-06-07· cited 12×
• In Re Tooke
  M.D. Florida· 1991-12-06· cited 10×
• In Re Berenato
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-10-29· cited 7×
• In Re Ramos
  D. Puerto Rico· 1997-08-08· cited 6×
• In Re Kazis
  D. Massachusetts· 2000-12-15· cited 5×