Skip to main content
· 10/25/2011

In Re Durham

Citations

  • 461 B.R. 139
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4106
  • 2011 WL 5079503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Section 109(g)(2) on Chapter 13 debtor eligibility ‘“does not explicitly prescribe for [sic] sua sponte dismissal or conversion,’ [but Section] 105(a) ‘accommodates such a result.’ ”
  • embracing the “causal 19 connection approach” but dismissing the case with a 180-day bar to re-filing because the debtors obtained dismissal of their first bankruptcy case six days after relief from stay was filed and then 20 the debtors re-filed two months later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin S. Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.