Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/30/1990
In Re Duncan
Citations
- 584 A.2d 1140
- 155 Vt. 402
- 1990 Vt. LEXIS 237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “we have consistently held that ‘absent compelling indication of error, we will sustain the interpretation of a statute by the administrative body responsible for its execution.’”
- interpretation of zoning staff and board accepted absent compelling indication of error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Morse, Peck, Cashman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-22· cited 121×
- In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-17· cited 106×
- In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 69×
- In Re John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-10-15· cited 59×
- In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-08-23· cited 41×
- In Re Champlain College Maple Street DormitorySupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-08-14· cited 27×
- In Re MeakerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-03-01· cited 27×
- In Re WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-02-11· cited 23×
- Estate of George v. Vermont League of Cities & TownsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-01-14· cited 21×
- In Re Appeal of LashinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-07-05· cited 21×
- Bedini v. FrostSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-15· cited 17×
- In Re KisielSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-29· cited 17×
- In Re Appeal of JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-05-09· cited 14×
- In re Burlington Airport PermitSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-07-25· cited 13×
- Timberlake Associates v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-25· cited 10×
- In re Appeal of ChatelainSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-06-28· cited 9×
- Crosby v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-11-21· cited 6×
- In re Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 PermitSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-11-09· cited 5×
- MBL Associates v. City of South BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-06-29· cited 1×
- Harwood Union High School District v. Harwood Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-04-06· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-09-01· cited 64×
- MTR. OFF SHORE REST. CORP. v. LindenNew York Court of Appeals· 1972-03-22· cited 39×
- Dresner v. CarraraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-02-23· cited 23×
- Route 4 Associates v. Town of Sherburne Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-15· cited 16×
- In Re Vermont Health Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-08-03· cited 12×
- Hudson-Thompson, Inc. v. Leslie C. King Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1978-08-18· cited 9×
- Stevens v. Essex Junction Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-02-03· cited 8×
- Vermont Camping Ass'n v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-05-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.