Skip to main content
· 1/4/1984

In Re Drolshagen

Citations

  • 310 S.E.2d 927
  • 280 S.C. 84
  • 1984 S.C. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • questioning of student by principal in principal’s office was not custodial interrogation even though police officers were present during questioning
  • juvenile questioned by school officials in presence of police officers; “Merely because the questioning took place in the principal’s office, in the presence of police officers, did not render it a custodial interrogation.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Lewis, Littlejohn, Gregory, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.