Skip to main content
E.D. Michigan· 12/1/1999

In Re Dow Corning Corp.

Citations

  • 244 B.R. 696
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1789
  • 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 169
  • 1999 WL 1398599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a presumption of unfairness only arises if the proposed plan provides for “either a materially lower recovery or a greater allocation of risk” for the dissenters
  • describing four-factor test adapted from chapter 13 to chapter 11 context in In re Aztec Co., 107 B.R. 585, 588-91 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1989) and collecting cases applying Aztec test and variations that eliminated overlapping considerations
  • listing cases applying four-factor test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arthur J. Spector

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.