E.D. Michigan· 12/1/1999
In Re Dow Corning Corp.
Citations
- 244 B.R. 696
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1789
- 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 169
- 1999 WL 1398599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a presumption of unfairness only arises if the proposed plan provides for “either a materially lower recovery or a greater allocation of risk” for the dissenters
- describing four-factor test adapted from chapter 13 to chapter 11 context in In re Aztec Co., 107 B.R. 585, 588-91 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1989) and collecting cases applying Aztec test and variations that eliminated overlapping considerations
- listing cases applying four-factor test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arthur J. Spector
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Class Five Nevada v. Dow Corning Corp. (In Re Dow Corning Corp.)Sixth Circuit· 2002-01-29· cited 78×
- In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.D. Delaware· 2001-09-12· cited 68×
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2000-11-13· cited 59×
- In Re Tribune Co.D. Delaware· 2011-10-31· cited 54×
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Charter Communications Operating, LLC (In Re Charter Communications)S.D. New York· 2009-11-17· cited 53×
- In Re Tci 2 Holdings, LLCD. New Jersey· 2010-04-12· cited 30×
- In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.D. Delaware· 2006-08-14· cited 28×
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, N.V.D. Delaware· 2003-06-10· cited 12×
- Tribune Company v.Third Circuit· 2020-08-26· cited 11×
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2002-12-11· cited 8×
- In Re Unbreakable Nation Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-05-19· cited 7×
- Law Debenture Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Tribune Media Co. (In re Tribune Media Co.)D. Delaware· 2018-07-30· cited 7×
- In re Tribune Co.D. Delaware· 2012-04-09· cited 7×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 2002-01-29· cited 5×
- In re BWP Transport, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2011-12-23· cited 3×
- Noah S. Bunker, Paul Carrell, Everett Brew Houston, Jr., W. Andrew Buchholz, Scott J. Leighty, Jad L. Davis, and Holly Clause v. Tracy D. StrandhagenTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-03-16
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street PartnershipSupreme Court· 1999-05-03· cited 353×
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)Ninth Circuit· 1982-06-29· cited 119×
- Homsy v. Floyd (In Re Vitek, Inc.)Fifth Circuit· 1995-04-25· cited 66×
- In Re Aztec Co.M.D. Tennessee· 1989-11-22· cited 61×
- In the Matter of 203 N. Lasalle Street Partnership, an Illinois Limited Partnership, Debtor-Appellee, Appeal Of: Bank of America IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 59×
- In Re KovichW.D. Michigan· 1980-06-09· cited 52×
- In Re DziedzicS.D. Texas· 1981-03-06· cited 41×
- In Re BowlesE.D. Virginia· 1985-04-04· cited 40×
- In Re Mortgage Inv. Co. of El Paso, Tex.W.D. Texas· 1990-02-14· cited 35×
- In Re Sacred Heart Hospital of NorristownE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-05-17· cited 31×
- In Re 203 North LaSalle Street Ltd. PartnershipN.D. Illinois· 1995-12-05· cited 30×
- In Re Creekside Landing, Ltd.M.D. Tennessee· 1992-04-30· cited 26×
- In Re PerkinsN.D. Oklahoma· 1985-07-15· cited 25×
- Bank of America, Illinois v. 203 North Lasalle Street PartnershipN.D. Illinois· 1996-05-01· cited 24×
- In Re Buttonwood Partners, Ltd.S.D. New York· 1990-02-28· cited 24×
- In Re HarrisE.D. Michigan· 1986-06-13· cited 22×
- In Re Stratford Associates Ltd. PartnershipD. Kansas· 1992-09-21· cited 21×
- In Re Crosscreek Apartments, Ltd.E.D. Tennessee· 1997-09-26· cited 20×
- Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. Cook (In Re Cook)D. New Mexico· 1982-12-22· cited 20×
- Matter of Rochem, Ltd.D. New Jersey· 1985-10-16· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.