Skip to main content

Citations

  • 65 A.3d 88
  • 2013 WL 1831707
  • 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]rial court judgments, which come to us with a presumption of correctness, should be upheld when there is no indication in the record that the trial court was unaware of the law’s requirements.” (quoting Mattete v. United States, 902 A.2d 113, 116 (D.C. 2006))
  • “[T]rial court judgments, which come to us with a presumption of correctness, should be upheld when there is no indication in the record that the trial court was unaware of the law’s 27 We acknowledge that, in Junior v. United States, 634 A.2d 411 (D.C. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Oberly, Wagner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.