District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/14/1982
Head v. United States
Citations
- 451 A.2d 615
- 1982 D.C. App. LEXIS 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where evidence tended to prove appellant was the principal, aiding and abetting instruction not error
- where evidence tended to prove appellant was the principal, aiding and abetting instruction not error
- for purposes of felony-murder, crime of robbery is continuing offense as long as asportation of goods continues
- for purposes of felony-murder, crime of robbery is continuing offense as long as asportation of goods continues
- “[a] conviction for armed robbery requires a showing of a taking of property of value ... ”
- “[M]ere coincidence in time of a robbery and a murder is insufficient to support a felony murder conviction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Kern, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 374×
- Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-04-19· cited 85×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-03-12· cited 67×
- Lemon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-26· cited 66×
- Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 65×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-05-31· cited 64×
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-09· cited 64×
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-22· cited 64×
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-10-02· cited 63×
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 58×
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-01-11· cited 57×
- James Head v. Eric WilsonD.C. Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 57×
- Thacker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-14· cited 55×
- Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-28· cited 54×
- Prophet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-31· cited 52×
- Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-03-23· cited 47×
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-11-29· cited 47×
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-08-09· cited 46×
- McAdoo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-24· cited 45×
- Hanna v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-12· cited 43×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1982-03-31· cited 917×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
- Curley v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1947-01-13· cited 568×
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 322×
- Chatwin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-02-04· cited 193×
- Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-24· cited 162×
- Willie E. Pendergrast v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-26· cited 128×
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesD.C. Circuit· 1975-06-19· cited 112×
- Warren v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-10-09· cited 85×
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-05· cited 80×
- Branch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-04-19· cited 79×
- William C. Coleman v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1961-10-10· cited 75×
- Day v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-10· cited 66×
- United States v. Alphonso T. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1970-09-04· cited 65×
- Willcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-09-19· cited 63×
Other cases named Head v. United States
28 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-01-11· cited 57×
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 12×
- Head v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1952-10-08· cited 6×
- Head v. United StatesW.D. Washington· 1973-09-18· cited 2×
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1×
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 1×
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 1×
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 1×
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-11-01
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-04-26
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-10-04
- Head v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1985-10-01
- Head v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1925-03-13
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1918-12-16
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-03-09
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-05-28
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-06-09
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-11-01
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-04-26
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-04-26
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-01-10
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-10-01
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-10-04
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2019-10-07
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2019-10-07
- Head v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2019-11-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.