N.D. Iowa· 8/17/1993
In Re Dencklau
Citations
- 158 B.R. 796
- 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1309
- 1993 WL 359795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not ruling out the possibility that a creditor could be held liable for a sheriffs postpetition garnishment of a debtor’s wages
- sanctioning sheriff in collecting garnishment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William L. Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re TimbsE.D. Tennessee· 1994-06-22· cited 40×
- In Re GoodfellowN.D. Iowa· 2003-09-03· cited 24×
- Preston v. GMPQ, LLC. (In Re Preston)W.D. Missouri· 2008-10-07· cited 9×
- In Re SeeN.D. Iowa· 2003-10-28· cited 7×
- In Re BlandE.D. Arkansas· 1998-09-02· cited 4×
- Davis v. Conrad Family Ltd. Partnership (In Re Davis)N.D. Ohio· 1999-11-30· cited 4×
- In Re HildrethM.D. Alabama· 2007-02-09· cited 3×
- In Re HromidkoN.D. Iowa· 2003-11-21· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoFirst Circuit· 1983-10-11· cited 260×
- In Re John Rothwell Knaus, Debtor. John Rothwell Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1989-11-13· cited 184×
- Wagner v. Ivory (In Re Wagner)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-06-12· cited 151×
- Aponte v. Aungst (In Re Aponte)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-02-23· cited 49×
- McLaughlin v. Fireman's Trust Mortgage Corp. (In Re McLaughlin)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-02-22· cited 42×
- Taborski v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceN.D. Illinois· 1992-03-10· cited 39×
- In Re DungeyS.D. Ohio· 1989-05-02· cited 27×
- In Re NWFX, Inc.W.D. Arkansas· 1987-10-15· cited 14×
- Matter of YetterS.D. Iowa· 1990-03-22· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.