Skip to main content
· 5/2/1989

In Re Dungey

Citations

  • 99 B.R. 814
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 658
  • 1989 WL 44542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the creditor had an affirmative obligation to return wages garnished postpetition in violation of the automatic stay
  • finding award of $100.00 in punitive damages warranted based on creditor’s failure to restore wages garnished post-petition to debtor
  • describing the argument that a creditor can passively watch collection efforts that creditor set into motion as “patently absurd”
  • describing the argument that a creditor can passively watch collection efforts that creditor set into motion as “patently absurd”
  • award of punitive damages awarded notwithstanding debtor’s failure to request punitive damages where creditor who garnished wages postpetition failed to restore garnished wages to debtor
  • creditor under affirmative duty to release garnishment, damages and attorney’s fees awarded to debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.