Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/26/2000
In re Deana E.
Citations
- 61 Conn. App. 197
- 763 A.2d 45
- 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[t]he decision whether to bifurcate a termination of parental rights proceeding lies solely within the discretion of the trial court\
- “A petition to terminate parental rights consists of two phases .... It is not necessary, however, that the two phases be the subject of separate hearings. One unified trial . . . is permissible.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spear
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-02· cited 101×
- In re Ashley S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-06· cited 54×
- In re Deana E.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-12-26· cited 52×
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-23· cited 41×
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 27×
- In re Jennifer W.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 26×
- In re Jacob W.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-11-16· cited 12×
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 10×
- State v. DrakefordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 10×
- Murray v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-14· cited 8×
- In re Katia V.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-17
- In re Deana E.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-02-15
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 696×
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-02-11· cited 332×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-15· cited 307×
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-21· cited 208×
- In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-19· cited 144×
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-18· cited 140×
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-18· cited 113×
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-11-17· cited 109×
- In re Alexander V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 97×
- In re John G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-30· cited 81×
- In re Danuael D.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-16· cited 77×
- In re Deana E.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-12-26· cited 52×
- In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-04-07· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.