District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/21/2001
In re D.D.
Citations
- 775 A.2d 1096
- 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Possession of recently “stolen goods permits the reasonable inference that the person possessing it stole it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Ruiz, Wagner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 600×
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 308×
- Willie E. Pendergrast v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-26· cited 128×
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-09-14· cited 94×
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-15· cited 92×
- United States v. Walter J. Barlow, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1972-11-17· cited 91×
- Poulnot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-01· cited 80×
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-03-07· cited 58×
- Franklin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-01-13· cited 26×
- Lattimore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-24· cited 24×
- Durphy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1967-11-27· cited 21×
- Franklin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 21×
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-04-09· cited 15×
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-04-28· cited 14×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-08-22· cited 9×
- Stevenson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-03-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.