Skip to main content

In re D.D.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2073

Syllabus

Because the trial court failed to substantially comply with Juv.R. 29(D) when accepting appellant's admission, the trial court erred by denying appellant's motion to withdraw his admission.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.