In Re David S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Where officer observed suspected drug transaction, “ordering] [defendant] to the ground and placing] him in handcuffs [ ] required probable cause, which the officer failed to demonstrate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Longshore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-08· cited 157×
• In Re David S.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-22· cited 64×
• Trott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-25· cited 23×
• State v. Holt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-29· cited 7×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• Adams v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Sibron v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
• Texas v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
• Minnesota v. Dickerson
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
• Gibbs v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-07-03· cited 35×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-15· cited 27×
• Aguilar v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-04· cited 26×
• In Re Appeal No. 113
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-23· cited 5×