S.D. Ohio· 7/16/1985
In Re Daniels
Citations
- 51 B.R. 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A classic cause for invoking the cure of reopening is to add an omitted creditor to the schedules.”
- “[a] classic cause for invoking the cure of reopening is to add an omitted creditor to the schedules”
- omitted creditor given 30 days in re-opened case to file nondischargeability complaint
- added creditor given “appropriate period” in which to file dischargeability complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burton Perlman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Michael C. Soult, D.M.D., Debtor, Michael C. Soult, D.M.D., Debtor-Appellee v. William C. Maddox, D.D.S., Creditor-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1990-01-23· cited 36×
- In Re CandelariaE.D. New York· 1990-11-15· cited 26×
- In Re WalkerD. New Hampshire· 1996-04-26· cited 20×
- Matter of McDanielN.D. Georgia· 1998-01-30· cited 19×
- In Re MoyetteE.D. New York· 1999-03-23· cited 12×
- Dunn v. Dunn (In Re Dunn)S.D. Ohio· 1998-09-17· cited 10×
- In Re RhodesE.D. Arkansas· 1988-06-24· cited 9×
- In Re BrownS.D. Ohio· 1986-06-11· cited 7×
- In Re DeMareN.D. New York· 1987-06-10· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.