In Re Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the spousal-exclusion interpretation is the “best reading” of the “with respect to the debtor” limitation in- the context of § 362 and the Bankruptcy Code as a whole
• “Reading the phrase “with respect to the debtor” as an all-property exclusion would make § 362(c)(3)(A
• “In a joint case, it may be that one of the spouses (a ‘serially-filing’ spouse) had a prior bankruptcy case dismissed within a year of the pending filing, while the other (a ‘newly-filing1 spouse) did not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 50×
• Smith v. ME Bureau of Revenue Services
  First Circuit· 2018-12-12· cited 28×
• Rinard v. Positive Investments, Inc. (In Re Rinard)
  C.D. California· 2011-05-09· cited 24×
• In re Bender
  E.D. New York· 2016-12-06· cited 19×
• In re Rodriguez
  D. New Mexico· 2013-02-11· cited 16×
• In Re Furlong
  C.D. Illinois· 2010-03-19· cited 14×
• In re Goodrich
  D. Vermont· 2018-07-20· cited 13×
• In re Scott-Hood
  W.D. Texas· 2012-06-18· cited 12×
• In re Roach
  M.D. Alabama· 2016-08-25· cited 11×
• In Re Robinson
  W.D. Michigan· 2010-04-16· cited 8×
• Vitalich v. Bank of New York Mellon
  N.D. California· 2016-08-10· cited 8×
• In re Smith
  D. Maine· 2017-08-18· cited 6×
• Smith v. Maine Bureau of Revenue Servs.
  D. Maine· 2018-05-16· cited 4×
• In re Keeler
  N.D. Georgia· 2016-11-22· cited 3×
• In re Goodrich
  D. Vermont· 2018-09-24· cited 3×
• In re Dev
  E.D. North Carolina· 2018-10-26· cited 3×
• In re Wade
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-06-06· cited 2×
• Antal v. Carroll (In Re Antal)
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-10-20

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Connecticut National Bank v. Germain
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 1,823×
• Johnson v. Home State Bank
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
• Chickasaw Nation v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 405×
• United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-11· cited 319×
• In Re Jones
  E.D. North Carolina· 2006-03-21· cited 42×
• Holcomb v. Hardeman (In Re Holcomb)
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 39×
• United States v. Yellin (In Re Weinstein)
  First Circuit· 2001-11-30· cited 34×
• In Re Jupiter
  D. South Carolina· 2006-06-21· cited 32×
• In Re Curry
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-02-22· cited 23×
• In Re Trapp
  D. South Carolina· 2001-02-05· cited 14×
• In Re Parker
  S.D. New York· 2006-01-04· cited 9×
• In Re Haisley
  E.D. Louisiana· 2006-07-18· cited 2×