Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/12/2025
In re C.Z.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1699
Syllabus
Permanent Custody; Best Interests; R.C. 2151.4117. Trial court's grant of permanent custody to agency was supported by clear and convincing evidence. Parents did not demonstrate plain error regarding any noncompliance with R.C. 2151.4117.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re H.M.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 85×
- In re A.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-14· cited 17×
- In re L.R.-L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-22· cited 10×
- In re J.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-07· cited 9×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-28· cited 8×
- In re J.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-08-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.