Skip to main content

In re A.M.

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1164

Syllabus

Permanent custody R.C. 2151.414 best interest Kinship Caregiver Law R.C. 2151.4116 - 2151.4119 legal custody constitutional rights substantive due process. There is no reversible error with respect to the Kinship Caregiver Law. The trial court's judgment denying mother's motion for legal custody to maternal aunt and granting permanent custody to the agency was affirmed. The trial court's judgment finding that it was in the child's best interest to be placed in the permanent custody of the agency was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The trial court did not violate mother's substantive due process rights as applied to the facts of her case.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.