E.D. New York· 10/23/1986
In Re Compass Van & Storage Corp.
Citations
- 65 B.R. 1007
- 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a contract must concern an obligor’s “special knowledge, unique skill or talent, singular judgment and taste” to qualify as a personal services contract
- “Personal service contracts synthesize into those consensual agreements of ineluctable genre and distinctive characteristics that commit to a special knowledge, unique skill or talent, singular judgment and taste.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Albert Parente
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Prazen v. ShoopIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-11-24· cited 30×
- In Re Fastrax, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1991-05-17· cited 15×
- Doltz v. Harris & AssociatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-08-13· cited 15×
- City of Jamestown v. James Cable Partners, L.P. (In Re James Cable Partners, L.P.)M.D. Georgia· 1993-06-04· cited 10×
- In Re Sunrise Restaurants, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1991-06-28· cited 10×
- In Re Wabash Valley Power Ass'n, Inc.S.D. Indiana· 1987-09-21· cited 10×
- In Re C.A.F. Bindery, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-09-04· cited 8×
- In Re Alltech Plastics, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 1987-03-26· cited 8×
- In Re Rooster, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-05-31· cited 7×
- In Re Health Plan of the RedwoodsN.D. California· 2002-06-30· cited 6×
- Donahue v. Multimedia, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-10· cited 5×
- Unnamed caseCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-12-23
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 2,011×
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 1,739×
- In the Matter of Queens Boulevard Wine & Liquor Corp., D/B/A Gold Star Wine & Liquor, Debtor-Appellee v. Anita Blum, Petitioner-Landlord-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1974-06-11· cited 74×
- La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-06-06· cited 44×
- Burger King Corp. v. Rovine Corp. (In Re Rovine Corp.)W.D. Tennessee· 1980-10-22· cited 40×
- Coy L. Weaver and Helen F. Weaver v. Richard M. Hutson, Ii, Trustee of Landmark Inns of Durham, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1972-05-11· cited 38×
- Rossetti v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-06-14· cited 38×
- Des Moines Blue Ribbon Distributors, Inc. v. Drewrys Ltd. U. S. A.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1964-07-16· cited 37×
- In Re Taylor Manufacturing, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 1980-10-28· cited 34×
- In The Matter Of Fontainebleau Hotel CorporationFifth Circuit· 1975-07-11· cited 33×
- Varisco v. Oroweat Food Co. (In Re Varisco)M.D. Florida· 1981-12-04· cited 33×
- Deaton v. LawsonWashington Supreme Court· 1905-11-14· cited 27×
- In Re Coors of North Mississippi, Inc.N.D. Mississippi· 1983-03-04· cited 17×
- Villar & Co. v. CondeFirst Circuit· 1929-02-09· cited 16×
- Matter of Bronx-Westchester MacK Corp.S.D. New York· 1982-05-19· cited 16×
- Foster v. Callaghan & Co.S.D. New York· 1918-01-25· cited 9×
- Miller v. Mutual Holding Co.Sixth Circuit· 1939-01-16· cited 5×
- Knipe v. BarkdullCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-11-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.