In re Collier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that MCR 2.603, the rule pertaining to defaults, is not among the rules specifically incorporated into juvenile proceedings, and therefore, not applicable
• “Practitioners in the field of child protective proceedings know well that some parents do not always show up for hearings.”
• “In those instances [where a parent does not appear], assuming proper notice was given, a parent’s interests are protected by counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Miller Minors
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2023-06-22
• In Re J Lovitt Minor
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2024-04-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Sanders
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2014-06-02· cited 469×
• In Re Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-11-24· cited 385×
• In Re Hatcher
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 114×
• In Re SLH, AJH, & VAH
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-24· cited 91×
• In re Kanjia
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30· cited 37×
• In Re Hall
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-04-01· cited 28×
• Pascoe v. Sova
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-07· cited 13×
• Bye v. Ferguson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-08-23· cited 12×