Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 11/1/1996

In Re Cole

Citations

  • 202 B.R. 356
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1390
  • 1996 WL 650725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the pending motion concerns a matrimonial action, the decision turns on a traditional stay relief analysis.”
  • “The discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(b) does not encompass postpetition debts . . .”
  • “In New York, matrimonial courts have long been empowered, in connection with divorce actions, to determine the issues of title to property and to make directions pertaining to the possession of property.”
  • “The bankruptcy court can limit stay relief to the liquidation of the amount of the Purewal’s unsecured claim, and require her to return to the bankruptcy court to enforce her judgment through the claims allowance process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stuart M. Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.