In re C.L.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3782
Syllabus
Appellant's adjudication for illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material or performance was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the record established that appellant possessed and shared a photograph of a 13-year-old minor while she was in a state of nudity. Though the photograph is not zoomed in on the victim's genitalia, the photograph depicts her entire body with naked breasts and exposed genital area. In addition, the trial court did not err by permitting the state to amend its complaint or in denying appellant's motion to suppress.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 432×
- In re WatsonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 140×
- State v. YoungOhio Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 127×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-09· cited 118×
- State v. KinsworthyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-14· cited 50×
- State v. DuganOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-11· cited 21×
- In re K.L.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.