Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/11/2025

In re C.L.

Citations

2025 Ohio 2814

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err in granting permanent custody to the Department of Job and Family Services. The decision was in the children's best interest because mother continued to expose her children to mental trauma and the risk of physical violence by being unwilling to meaningfully alter her relationship with father or sever her relationship with him. The Agency made reasonable efforts to help mother pursue this goal, including referrals to domestic violence support programs.

Judges: Siebert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
Goldfuss v. Davidson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
In re S.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 57×
In re R.K.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-07· cited 39×
In re D.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-19· cited 37×
In re C.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-14· cited 35×
In re A.J.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 33×
In re F.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-08· cited 32×
In re J.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-30· cited 29×
In re M.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-24· cited 29×
In re R.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-23· cited 27×
In re K.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 26×
In re D.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-28· cited 25×
In re A.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-07· cited 22×
In re G.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-29· cited 21×
In re B.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-09· cited 19×
In re A.M.L.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-03· cited 18×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.