S.D. New York· 8/10/2004
In Re Citigroup, Inc. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 330 F. Supp. 2d 367
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15731
- 2004 WL 1794465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff failed to state a Section 10(b) claim when it alleged that defendant \breached a duty to disclose that its revenues were 'unsustainable' \ because plaintiff pointed to \no projections or future predictions in the challenged disclosure documents\
- finding “Citigroup was not required to make disclosures predicting such litigation” and “litigation risks associated with its Enron-related, analysis/investment banking and reporting activities”
- dismissing a complaint based on plaintiff's failure to allege fraud in connection with the sale of issuer's own securities
- dismissing allegations defendants failed to adhere to risk management policies as mismanagement claims
- \[t]he securities laws were not designed to provide an umbrella cause of action for the review of management practices\
- “ ‘fraud by hindsight’ [is not] a viable basis upon which to challenge management practices that ultimately result in losses”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swain
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named In Re Citigroup, Inc. Securities Litigation
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re Citigroup Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-11-09· cited 46×
- In re Citigroup Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-08-01· cited 38×
- In re Citigroup Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2016-08-09· cited 9×
- In Re Citigroup Inc. Securities LitigationJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation· 2009-08-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.