Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/2/1999
In Re Christopher T.
Citations
- 740 A.2d 69
- 129 Md. App. 28
- 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contrasting Rule 4-215(d), 2 which expressly allows the circuit court to find inaction to be a waiver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1961-11-13· cited 1,308×
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 1,066×
- Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-06· cited 135×
- In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-29· cited 80×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-24· cited 45×
- Moten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-23· cited 41×
- In Re Joshua David C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-08-29· cited 29×
- State v. WischhusenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-10· cited 23×
- In Re Devon T.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-30· cited 21×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-10-24· cited 19×
- Okon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-30· cited 12×
- In Re Appeal No. 544, Term 1974Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-02-24· cited 11×
- In Re Appeal No. 101, Term 1976Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.