Texas Supreme Court· 7/3/2002
In Re CH
Citations
- 89 S.W.3d 17
- 2001 WL 1903109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not yet released for publication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jefferson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In the Interest of H.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-07-10· cited 104×
- In Re HRTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-07-10
- Robinson, Lisa v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory ServicesTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-30
- in the Interest of K.M.K., a Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-12-11
- in the Interest of O.Z., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-08-28
- in the Interest of M. G. and E. G.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-12-31
- in the Interest of D. D. H., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-09-24
- in the Interest of M.N.O., M.T.O. and L.O., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-12-19
- in the Interest of N.N.S. and J.D.L.S., MinorsTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-11-21
- in the Interest of S.M.M.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-08-29
- in the Interest of K.F., A/K/A K.L.D., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-08-15
- in the Interest of R.N.G. and S.L.G., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-12-12
- in the Interest of E.C. and H.C., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-09-26
- in the Interest of E.A.GTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-14
- in the Interest of A. N.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-10-03
- Jose Romulo Lopez v. Anita Michelle LopezTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-10-07
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 4,662×
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-01· cited 4,606×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-04-02· cited 2,766×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- In the Interest of G. M.Texas Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,156×
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 1,025×
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-05-14· cited 874×
- State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 658×
- Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court· 1976-07-14· cited 594×
- In the Interest of W.S.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-05-18· cited 216×
- In Interest of DLNTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-12-23· cited 215×
- D.O. v. Texas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-17· cited 201×
- In the Interest of J.J. & K.J.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-10-31· cited 161×
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court· 1944-04-03· cited 141×
- In the Interest of J.N.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-16· cited 132×
- Jaffe Aircraft Corp. v. CarrTexas Supreme Court· 1993-12-08· cited 120×
- In the Interest of B.S.T.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-10-08· cited 119×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.