Skip to main content
· 10/8/1998

In the Interest of B.S.T.

Citations

  • 977 S.W.2d 481
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 6417
  • 1998 WL 724795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding insufficient evidence to support termination under subsection D because there was no evidence that the father knew his children were in an endangering environment
  • finding insufficient evidence to support termination under subsection D because there was no evidence that the father knew his children were in an endangering environment
  • holding the evidence was sufficient to support termination under subsection (N
  • holding the evidence was sufficient to support termination under subsection (N
  • holding the evidence was sufficient to support termination under subsection (N
  • finding legally insufficient evidence to support termination under subsection D because there was no evidence that the father knew his children were in an endangering environment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Lee, Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.