In Re CC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is a general rule that appellate courts will not consider any error which counsel for accused could have called, but did not call, to the attention ofthe trial court at the time when such error could have been avoided or corrected by the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Mundine, Nathaniel v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2012-11-07

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
• Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller
  Texas Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 1,110×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 244×
• In the Matter of C.O.S.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 203×
• In re A.S.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-11· cited 96×
• In re J.R.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-09-27· cited 85×
• In Re C. C.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-02· cited 77×
• In re M.S.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-27· cited 70×
• Matter of K.L.C.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-08-13· cited 64×
• In re L.G.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-22· cited 55×
• J.P.O., Matter Of
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-04-24· cited 44×
• P.L.W. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 35×
• In re M.A.S.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-04-11· cited 7×