In Re Carlton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \most compelling argument\ against approval of nonstandard provisions was that \countless variations ... inevitably will be scripted into chapter 13 plans by a bevy of debtors' attorneys\
• “After Espinosa there can be no doubt about a bankruptcy court’s authority and responsibility to deny confirmation of an offending plan although the creditor who would suffer the consequences of confirmation fails to object.”
• “After Espinosa there can be no doubt about a bankruptcy court’s authority and responsibility to deny confirmation of an offending plan although the creditor who would suffer the consequences of confirmation fails to object.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Santander Consumer, USA, Inc. v. Houlik (In re Houlik)
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-10-29· cited 28×
• In re Brown
  N.D. Indiana· 2016-08-02· cited 7×
• In re Parkman
  S.D. Mississippi· 2018-08-13· cited 5×
• In re Wright
  N.D. Iowa· 2011-12-28· cited 4×
• In Re Duke
  M.D. Georgia· 2011-03-11· cited 3×
• In re Phile
  S.D. Ohio· 2011-09-27· cited 1×
• In Re Del-A-Rae, Inc.
  S.D. Georgia· 2011-03-09

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
• Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
• Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. Hanson
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 177×
• IN Re: Carmen Bateman, Debtor, --- Universal American Mortgage Company v. Carmen Bateman
  Eleventh Circuit· 2003-05-22· cited 112×
• In the Matter of Paul D. Folendore and Helen H. Folendore, Debtors. Paul D. Folendore and Helen H. Folendore v. U.S. Small Business Administration
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-01-12· cited 80×
• In Re Anna S. Litton, Debtor. Anna S. Litton, Debtor-Appellant v. Wachovia Bank, Creditorappellee, Jo S. Widener, Trustee-Appellee
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-05-27· cited 64×
• In Re Mammel
  N.D. Iowa· 1998-06-09· cited 29×
• Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)
  D. Kansas· 2008-05-06· cited 28×
• In Re Watson
  D. Delaware· 2008-04-07· cited 22×
• Beskin v. Maupin (In Re Maupin)
  W.D. Virginia· 2007-11-01· cited 14×
• In Re Booth
  E.D. Arkansas· 2009-01-14· cited 8×
• Tepper v. Burnham (In Re Tepper)
  M.D. Florida· 2002-05-20· cited 6×
• In Re Aldridge
  S.D. Alabama· 2005-11-16· cited 6×
• In Re Emery
  E.D. Kentucky· 2008-05-16· cited 5×