Skip to main content
· 9/9/2010

In Re Carlton

Citations

  • 437 B.R. 412
  • 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 2910
  • 2010 WL 3655493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \most compelling argument\ against approval of nonstandard provisions was that \countless variations ... inevitably will be scripted into chapter 13 plans by a bevy of debtors' attorneys\
  • “After Espinosa there can be no doubt about a bankruptcy court’s authority and responsibility to deny confirmation of an offending plan although the creditor who would suffer the consequences of confirmation fails to object.”
  • “After Espinosa there can be no doubt about a bankruptcy court’s authority and responsibility to deny confirmation of an offending plan although the creditor who would suffer the consequences of confirmation fails to object.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James J. Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.