In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting hypothetical test in connection with similar statutory language of § 365(e)(2)(A)
• “Section 365(e)(2), which is an exception to the ipso facto invalidation provided by § 365(e) generally, is meant to reflect the same philosophy [as Section 365(c)(1) j.”
• “Congress did not intend § 365(c)(1) to preclude assumption of an otherwise nonassignable personal service contract if the performance to be given or received 'will be the same as if no petition had been filed.' Rather ... § 365(c)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).