Skip to main content
· 2/13/2006

Bonneville Power Administration v. Mirant Corp.

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 238
  • 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1050
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3438
  • 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 13
  • 2006 WL 330121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that bankruptcy courts have flexibility in determining whether cause exists to modify stay
  • “According to §. 365(f)(2)(A), assumption must precede, assignment.”
  • “According to § 365(f)(2)(A), assumption must precede assignment.”
  • agreeing 8 with Computer Commc’ns, Inc.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Smith, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.