In re C.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that absent finding of unfitness, court “may not remove a child from the parent’s custody at the dispositional stage of a juvenile proceeding”
• noting that absent finding of unfitness, court “may not remove a child from a parent’s custody at the dispositional stage of a juvenile proceeding”
• “[T]he failure to use the word ‘unfit’ does not necessarily preclude a finding of unfitness in fact.”
• sparse findings did not support conclusion that children at risk of future abuse
• sparse findings did not support conclusion that children at risk of future abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re D.C., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-21· cited 31×
• In re J.D.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-09-06· cited 10×
• In re T.R.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-04-09· cited 3×
• In Re JD
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-09-06
• In Re TR
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-04-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re M. B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 51×
• In Re Taft Corners Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-30· cited 45×
• In re R.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-05-27· cited 41×
• In re E.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-03· cited 29×
• In re C.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-21· cited 18×