In Re Taft Corners Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues decided under an umbrella permit could not be reopened and attacked in a subsequent application proceeding because those issues were final and not subject to review
• holding vested right in town plan in effect at time of original Act 250 umbrella permit
• stating that Environmental Board’s jurisdiction is limited by proceedings below and does not extend to new criteria never considered by district commission
• stating that Environmental Board’s jurisdiction is limited by proceedings below and does not extend to new criteria never considered by district commission
• stating that Environmental Board’s jurisdiction is limited by proceedings below and does not extend to new criteria never considered by district commission
• noting that the Board “has no jurisdiction to decide issues regarding criteria that were not before the district commission and not ruled upon by it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).