D. Utah· 6/10/2004
In Re Bushman
Citations
- 311 B.R. 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- motion for reargument should not be used to advance new arguments available at the time the original argument was heard, and a moving party’s failure to advance its best argument was not grounds to grant request for reargument
- reargument not permitted to merely advance new arguments or supporting facts which were available for presentation at the time of the original argument; a defendant’s failure to present its strongest case in the initial briefing does not entitle it to a second chance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judith A. Boulden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Drumm v. New England Loan Marketing Ass'n (In Re Drumm)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-08-19· cited 11×
- Devon Mobile Communications Liquidating Trust v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)S.D. New York· 2005-05-20· cited 5×
- Lyon v. Aguilar (In Re Aguilar)D. New Mexico· 2012-03-13· cited 4×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesTenth Circuit· 1992-02-21· cited 704×
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackFifth Circuit· 1981-01-26· cited 516×
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1970-06-29· cited 293×
- Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergTenth Circuit· 1983-08-26· cited 207×
- Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sSecond Circuit· 1963-05-21· cited 140×
- Plotner v. AT & T Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-01· cited 138×
- Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co.Tenth Circuit· 1990-07-26· cited 129×
- Pierce v. Cook & Co.Tenth Circuit· 1975-06-24· cited 125×
- Broitman v. Kirkland (In Re Kirkland)Tenth Circuit· 1996-06-12· cited 62×
- Dimeff v. Good (In Re Good)Tenth Circuit· 2002-08-07· cited 17×
- Van Skiver v. United StatesD. Kansas· 1990-11-28· cited 11×
- Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Racing & Gaming Co. I (In Re Sunflower Racing, Inc.)D. Kansas· 1998-07-31· cited 9×
- In Re: Apogee Robotics, Inc., a Colorado Corporation and Agv Acquisitions, Inc., Debtors. Apogee Robotics, Inc. v. Foss Realty, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-02-27· cited 4×
- Chapman v. Charles Schwab & Co. (In Re Chapman)N.D. Illinois· 2001-10-30· cited 4×
- In Re FranzD. Kansas· 1989-02-15· cited 2×
- Dowell v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF OKLAHOMA CITY PUB. S.W.D. Oklahoma· 1992-01-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.