In re Bush
Citations
- 126 F. 878
- 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 438
Syllabus
<p>1. Leases — Assignment—Covenants—Breach—Bankruptcy.</p> <p>Where a lessee made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, which was invalidated by bankruptcy proceedings commenced against him within four months thereafter, such assignment did not constitute a breach of a covenant in the lease prohibiting its assignment without the lessor’s consent.</p> <p>2. Same — Construction of Covenant.</p> <p>A covenant in a lease prohibiting the lessee’s assignment thereof without the lessor’s written consent, is not equivalent to a provision that the lease shall be void in case of the lessee’s bankruptcy.</p> <p>8. Same — Application of Covenant.</p> <p>A covenant in a lease prohibiting its assignment without the lessor’s consent, is not applicable to assignee’s taking under an assignment by operation of law, or to their immediate vendees.</p>
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. City of Tacoma v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-07-21· cited 9×
- Second Realty Corp. v. FioreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1949-05-03· cited 3×
- Holowaty ex rel. Cherka v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1935-12-16· cited 3×
- In re LevinsonW.D. Washington· 1923-12-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.