Randolph v. Scruggs
Citations
- 190 U.S. 533
- 23 S. Ct. 710
- 47 L. Ed. 1165
- 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1580
Syllabus
<p>1. A claim for professional services rendered to a bankrupt in the preparation of a general assignment, valid under the law of the State where made, is not entitled to be paid as. a preferential claim out of the estate in the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy when the adjudication in involuntary bankruptcy was made within four months after the making of the assignment and the assignment was set aside as in contravention of the bankrupt law.</p> <p>2. A claim for professional advice and legal services rendered such an as-signee prior to the adjudication of bankruptcy against the assignor, the assignment providing that the costs and expenses of administering the trust should be first paid, is not entitled under the deed to be provenas a preferential'claim against the bankrupt estate, but so far as the assignee would be allowed for payment of the claim, it may be preferred in the right of the assignee.</p> <p>3. On the facts in this case a claim against such an assignee for legal services rendered at his employment in resisting an adjudication of involuntary bankruptcy against the assignor -is not allowable as a preferential claim, when the necessary effect of the adjudication would be to set aside the assignment under which the assignee was- acting.</p> <p>4. The claim for services to the assignor for the preparation of the deed of trust to the assignee may be proved in the bankruptcy proceedings as an unsecured claim.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing administrative claim under the Bankruptcy Act for prepetition services by assignee for creditors
- state court mortgage foreclosure receiver is a custodian entitled to compensation as an. administrative expense in bankruptcy
- counsel for an assignee for the benefit of creditors is entitled to a preferred status in claiming compensation out of the estate for services performed prior to the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee
- counsel for an assignee for the benefit of creditors is entitled to a preferred status in claiming compensation out of the estate for services performed prior to the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court· 1918-02-04· cited 330×
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 193×
- In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1988-08-02· cited 188×
- In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.D. Utah· 1985-02-14· cited 147×
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court· 1935-11-11· cited 104×
- In the Matter of Cle-Ware Industries, Inc., Debtor. Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. v. Howard SokolskySixth Circuit· 1974-02-26· cited 99×
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 86×
- Conrad, Rubin & Lesser v. PenderSupreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 84×
- Galbraith v. VallelySupreme Court· 1921-04-11· cited 70×
- Guardian Trust Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1928-05-18· cited 62×
- Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellEighth Circuit· 1932-04-22· cited 56×
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.S.D. Ohio· 1984-08-31· cited 50×
- Matter of OlenE.D. Michigan· 1981-11-25· cited 45×
- In Re Lloyd, Carr and Company, Bankrupt (Two Cases). Appeal of Alan H. Abrahams. Appeal of United States of AmericaFirst Circuit· 1980-02-01· cited 40×
- Matter of Paramount Merrick, Inc., Bankrupt. Benjamin Finkel and Samuel L. Nadler, Copartners as Finkel & Nadler, David Strauss & Co., Inc.Second Circuit· 1958-02-14· cited 39×
- Hume v. MyersFourth Circuit· 1917-05-17· cited 36×
- In re StewartSixth Circuit· 1910-05-03· cited 35×
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court· 1923-05-21· cited 34×
- In Re Owl Drug Co.D. Nevada· 1936-08-07· cited 31×
- In re ChaseFirst Circuit· 1903-06-18· cited 31×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 1,026×
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 267×
- Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court· 1901-04-15· cited 192×
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court· 1899-05-22· cited 112×
- Wakeman v. GroverNew York Court of Chancery· 1832-10-22· cited 89×
- Boese v. KingSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 51×
- Williams v. GibbesSupreme Court· 1858-05-18· cited 19×
- Platt v. ArcherS.D. New York· 1876-05-22· cited 9×
- In re LainsD. Minnesota· 1877-07-28· cited 4×
- Havemeyer v. LoebS.D. New York· 1877-12-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.