Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 10/7/2004
In Re Bullock
Citations
- 146 S.W.3d 783
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 8921
- 2004 WL 2248002
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that despite the fact that a valid termination order is a jurisdictional prerequisite, \not all statutory prerequisites to filing suit are jurisdictional\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKeithen, Burgess, Gaultney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court· 2012-07-06· cited 418×
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court· 2017-08-31· cited 45×
- City of Seabrook v. Port of Houston AuthorityTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-18· cited 20×
- Harrison v. HarrisonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-03-13· cited 20×
- In the Interest of E.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-03· cited 7×
- In Re ErTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-03-03
- the City of Seabrook, Texas v. Port of Houston AuthorityTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-18
- in the Interest of M.Y.W and C.C.W., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-21
- Kristalyn Harrison v. Luke Harrison, James Allen Garner and Vickie Ann GarnerTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-03-13
- in the Interest of C. O. G., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-12-12
- In the Interest of F.I.D. and H.A.D. v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2024-06-27
- Willard Cox Jr., Will Cox, Inc. and Kevin Desormeaux D/B/A Talents Unlimited v. Kathleen KimberlinTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2025-07-10
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court· 1985-12-11· cited 1,738×
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court· 2000-02-10· cited 777×
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 516×
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 485×
- Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 340×
- Gorman v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 200×
- Essenburg v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 156×
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-07-02· cited 123×
- Cook Composites, Inc. v. Westlake Styrene Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-01-20· cited 106×
- Heggy v. American Trading Employee Retirement Account PlanTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-12-23· cited 44×
- In Re University Interscholastic LeagueTexas Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 39×
- In the Interest of T.R.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-11-12· cited 38×
- Richards v. Commission for Lawyer DisciplineTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-07-11· cited 28×
- Queen v. GoeddertzTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2001-07-12· cited 25×
- Schiesser v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-01· cited 21×
- Matter of Marriage of CollinsTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1994-03-15· cited 19×
- Mayberry v. American Home Assurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-12-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.