Washington Supreme Court· 2/10/2005
In Re Brown
Citations
- 105 P.3d 991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting \no Washington case recognizes that nonparents are guaranteed the fundamental rights of parents under the doctrine of in loco parentis\
- noting “no Washington case recognizes that nonparents are guaranteed the fundamental rights of parents under the doctrine of in loco parentis”
- citing/;^ re Custody ofSmith, 137 Wn.2d 1, 20-21, 969 P.2d 21 (1998), aff'd sub nom. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 120 S .Ct. 2054, 147 L. Ed. 2d 49(2000)[(plurality opinion]); see also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 92 S. Ct. 1526, 32 L. Ed. 2d 15 (1972
- \[N]o Washington case recognizes that nonparents are guaranteed the fundamental rights of parents under the doctrine of in loco parentis.\
- \[Nlo Washington case recognizes that nonparents are guaranteed the fundamental rights of parents under the doctrine of in loco parentis.\
- wherein the Washington Supreme Court stated that no case in that state “recognizes that nonparents are guaranteed the fundamental rights of parents under the doctrine of in loco parentis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 146×
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 128×
- In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 100×
- Shields v. HarwoodWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 96×
- Jones v. BarlowUtah Supreme Court· 2007-02-16· cited 66×
- Holt v. HoltWashington Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 52×
- Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-14· cited 34×
- Dunlavy v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-16· cited 33×
- Ongom v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-14· cited 32×
- Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2007-12-18· cited 31×
- In Re Dependency of TLGCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-19· cited 29×
- Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 21×
- In Re Dependency of Dc-M.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-01· cited 15×
- In re the Dependency of D.C.-M.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-01· cited 15×
- In re the Custody of J.E.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-04· cited 11×
- Leritz v. DeBurraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-07-09· cited 8×
- Barrett v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-29· cited 7×
- K.A.S. v. R.E.T.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-30· cited 6×
- State v. FaggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-11· cited 5×
- Minium v. ShmilenkoWashington Supreme Court· 2016-07-07· cited 5×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-19· cited 89×
- Luby v. Da SilvaWashington Supreme Court· 2005-02-10· cited 41×
- In Re the Marriage of SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-24· cited 25×
- In Re Custody of SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2000-03-01· cited 25×
- In Re Custody of SHBCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-18· cited 21×
- Luby v. DasilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-18· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.