In Re Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Texas “case law does not regard the continuous rental of farmland as a use “for the purposes of a home.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Magness
  N.D. Texas· 1993-11-09· cited 3×
• In Re Bohac
  W.D. Texas· 1990-05-25· cited 1×
• In re Pool
  W.D. Texas· 2019-03-05· cited 1×
• Elizabeth A. Lousteau and Brett Clanton v. Jaime L. Noriega and Sonia A. Noriega
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-08-27

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• White v. Stump
  Supreme Court· 1924-11-24· cited 283×
• Sullivan v. Barnett
  Texas Supreme Court· 1971-06-23· cited 183×
• In the Matter of Jerry Daniel Wilson
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-12-20· cited 26×
• In Re Sivley
  E.D. Tennessee· 1981-10-28· cited 26×
• Vaughn v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1955-04-21· cited 25×
• Lasseter v. Blackwell
  Texas Commission of Appeals· 1921-02-23· cited 20×
• In Re Harlan
  W.D. Texas· 1983-06-23· cited 18×
• White v. Blackman
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1942-12-22· cited 18×