In re Brandon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the applicable statutory scheme expressly directs Chapter 13 trustees to return funds on hand to the debtor. ... but only after payment of the allowed fees of the debtor’s attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jeffrey P. White & Associates, P.C. v. Fessenden (Wheaton)
  First Circuit· 2016-04-14· cited 32×
• In re Merovich
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-04-06· cited 4×
• In re Vonkreuter
  D. Colorado· 2016-02-12· cited 3×
• In re Hoggarth
  D. Colorado· 2016-02-23· cited 2×
• In re Fairnot
  E.D. Michigan· 2017-08-02· cited 2×
• In re Dubose
  M.D. Alabama· 2016-08-02· cited 1×
• In re Ivey
  E.D. Arkansas· 2017-03-21· cited 1×
• Wehrwein v. Roach (In re Kerr)
  N.D. Indiana· 2017-06-14· cited 1×
• In re Post
  W.D. Michigan· 2017-08-30· cited 1×
• In re Lettie
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2019-02-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. Viegelahn
  Supreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 183×
• In Re: Barry L. Michael v.
  Third Circuit· 2012-10-26· cited 74×
• Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-12· cited 31×
• Mary Viegelahn v. Charles Harris, III
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-07-07· cited 9×
• In re Beauregard
  D. New Mexico· 2015-07-10· cited 8×
• In re Sowell
  D. Minnesota· 2015-08-07· cited 6×
• In re Kirk
  N.D. Ohio· 2015-08-27· cited 5×
• Viegelahn v. Harris (In re Harris)
  W.D. Texas· 2013-03-22· cited 4×