Skip to main content
· 4/12/1990

Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'n

Citations

  • 572 A.2d 144
  • 319 Md. 226
  • 1990 Md. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under Maryland law a valid assignment transfers all right, title, and interest in the assigned funds to the assignee
  • concluding that such an assignment is a legally enforceable equitable claim not implicating a “danger of champerty or maintenance, nor any other public policy reason to preclude” such an assignment
  • indicating that assignment vests equitable title in assignee
  • considering whether there were any public policy reasons to preclude a particular assignment
  • considering whether there were any public policy reasons to preclude a particular assignment
  • recognizing the general right to assign claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Adkins, Blackwell, Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.