· 4/12/1990
Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'n
Citations
- 572 A.2d 144
- 319 Md. 226
- 1990 Md. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under Maryland law a valid assignment transfers all right, title, and interest in the assigned funds to the assignee
- concluding that such an assignment is a legally enforceable equitable claim not implicating a “danger of champerty or maintenance, nor any other public policy reason to preclude” such an assignment
- indicating that assignment vests equitable title in assignee
- considering whether there were any public policy reasons to preclude a particular assignment
- considering whether there were any public policy reasons to preclude a particular assignment
- recognizing the general right to assign claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Adkins, Blackwell, Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.