In Re Boswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that under Ohio law a homeowner exemption would be available only in the event of sale or other remedial right specified in § 2329.66(A)(1), is not controlling according to Owen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Mershman
  N.D. Ohio· 1993-08-19· cited 11×
• In Re Cushman
  N.D. Ohio· 1995-06-19· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Owen v. Owen
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 633×
• In Re Lamar Barclay Pine, Sr., and Shirlene Tucker Pine, Debtors. Melvin Giles and Wanda Giles, Debtors v. Credithrift of America, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-09-07· cited 102×
• In Re Rachel W. Opperman, Debtor. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Creditor-Appellee v. Rachel W. Opperman, Debtor-Appellant
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-08-22· cited 45×
• In Re Dwight H. Owen, Debtor. Dwight H. Owen v. Helen Owen
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-05-14· cited 25×
• Ford Motor Credit Corp. v. Dixon (In re Dixon)
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-09-19· cited 18×
• In Re Conyers
  E.D. Kentucky· 1991-07-30· cited 16×
• In Re Bursee
  N.D. Ohio· 1992-02-27· cited 11×
• In Re Moreland
  S.D. Ohio· 1992-06-10· cited 7×
• In Re Sullins
  S.D. Ohio· 1991-12-31· cited 7×
• In Re Puhl
  N.D. Ohio· 1992-01-31· cited 5×
• In Re Wheeler
  N.D. Ohio· 1992-02-12· cited 2×